As The Hill reports:

‘There is no rationale for the president to put forth Nauert’s name as his nominee as United Nations ambassador. In fact, the idea seems downright silly, no matter how much Trump loyalists try to cheer his pick across the finish line.

The sad saga of the last Trump pick to lead America’s diplomatic efforts at the United Nations, Nikki Haley, shows why Nauert also is a bad choice. She shares the same problem as Haley when she started in the role: a lack of any diplomatic experience or top-level expertise on global affairs.’

It’s quite clear, here, that Nauert’s ‘qualifications’ are other than those needed to keep our foreign allies and enemies in check, but just what is it that gets Nauert the job?