The question of how to cover Donald Trump has confounded many people working in the media industry since his election. There are so many areas of the president’s administration that warrant dissection that his near-daily onslaught of morning tweets started to prove something of a distraction from the potentially larger issues at hand.

So Rachel Maddow, host of MSNBC’s “The Rachel Maddow Show,” made a decision: tune them out.

“We developed sort of an informal, internal mantra … which is that we basically cover [the Trump administration] as if they are a silent movie,” Maddow told TheWrap earlier this month. “I stopped covering the Twitter feed and we started covering only what they do rather than what they say.”

Rachel Maddow has benefitted from largely ignoring the noise sitting right in front of her on Twitter every day.

“I really feel like it was helpful to me, in terms of trying to come up with what to talk about every day, and serving up information for our audience that is substantive and not manipulated by people at the White House,” she added. “It was helpful for us to just stop paying attention to what they were saying.”

Maddow made the decision for editorial reasons. But, if anything, the move away from the noise-making Twitter machine has only helped grow her sphere of influence.

Immediately following Trump’s election, Maddow’s viewership dropped significantly, perhaps as a result of left-leaning MSNBC viewers doing what they could to avoid the news.

Things have changed dramatically since then. Last month, more people watched “The Rachel Maddow Show” than at any other point in the show’s nine-year history, according to The New York Times. No other MSNBC show has ever drawn as many people in the 9 p.m. ET slot as hers did last month, the network said.

On average, the show pulled in 2.3 million viewers per episode for the month of February. That’s up from an average of 1.8 million viewers in January and more than double what it pulled in one year earlier, Nielsen told the Associated Press.

Speaking to The New York Times, Maddow downplayed her excitement over the current ratings surge, noting it was coming in part because of political turbulence.

“I don’t feel like a winner right now,” she said. “I don’t feel like, ‘Score! Let’s hope for even more senior diplomats to get fired!’”

What does excite her however, is the “surge in civic interest and engagement.” “It feels like a spontaneous, organic, pretty broad-based, heterogeneous, energized, constructive force,” she said.

The ratings bump isn’t limited to Maddow, nor is it limited to one network. MSNBC’s primetime viewership is up 55 percent from this time last year, and Fox News, “Saturday Night Live,” “PBS NewsHour” and Stephen Colbert’s “The Late Show” have seen so-called “Trump bumps,” as well.

But Maddow’s ratings jump is arguably the biggest, and it’s for the best sort of reason. She is informing people with substantial coverage that has broken out of the Twitter bubble, away from the noise.

“Nobody works harder than Rachel,” MSNBC President Phil Griffin told The Hill. “Rachel is a student. She is just a different kind of communicator. She weaves a story every day in that first 20 minutes of the show that connects dots, pulls things together, pulls historical references that really is just an amazing piece of work.”

He added, “And you come out of it smarter. It’s as simple as that.”

For her part, Maddow looks forward to going back to talking about the trivialities of Twitter.

“I pray for the day when the most important thing about the Trump administration is that the president said something inappropriate on Twitter,” Maddow told the AP. “[But] there are bigger and more valuable stories to be chasing than that.”

Don’t go yet! Try out our Entertainment newsletter. You’ll get celeb tidbits, late-night highlights, and the latest on TV and movies in your inbox, six days a week.